MOHD TARIQ vs UNION BANK OF INDIA Advocate - Sharad Mishra — WPS/3306/2026

Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010126062026

Filing Number

WPS/7258/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPS/3306/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

SELECTION, APPOINTMENT & RECRUITMENT INCLUDING EXAMINATION, INTERVIEW. ( 614 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD TARIQ

    Adv. DR. SHIV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA,Alka Shrivastava,Alka Shrivastava, ,RAJESH KUMAR KESHARWANI,Omkar Nath Srivastava,Alka Shrivastava

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION BANK OF INDIA Advocate - Sharad Mishra

  2. 2.The Chief General Manager (HR)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/3306/2026 Mohd Tariq sought a writ of mandamus from the Chhattisgarh High Court to compel Union Bank of India to relax personal interview qualifying marks by 0.5 marks and declare him selected with an appointment letter. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to file afresh if circumstances warrant future action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3306/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/3306/2026 Mohd Tariq sought a writ of mandamus from the Chhattisgarh High Court to compel Union Bank of India to relax personal interview qualifying marks by 0.5 marks and declare him selected with an appointment letter. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to file afresh if circumstances warrant future action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case