NEHRULAL SEN vs SMT. MAMTA SEN — CRR/493/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010125662026

Filing Number

CRR/5337/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRR/493/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 ( 1444 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NEHRULAL SEN

    Adv. SHIVENDU PANDYA,POOJA YADAV,POOJA YADAV, ,SMT. JYOTI KAUSHIK,POOJA YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. MAMTA SEN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by Nehrul Lal Sen challenging the appellate court's order that rejected his appeal in a domestic violence case filed by his wife under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that the protection officer's report supported the complainant's allegations and ruled that the petitioner's objections regarding the investigation procedure were matters to be examined during trial, not at the preliminary stage, hence the revision was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/493/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by Nehrul Lal Sen challenging the appellate court's order that rejected his appeal in a domestic violence case filed by his wife under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that the protection officer's report supported the complainant's allegations and ruled that the petitioner's objections regarding the investigation procedure were matters to be examined during trial, not at the preliminary stage, hence the revision was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case