SHAILESH KUMAR RAI @ MINTU RAI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1284/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010125602026

Filing Number

MCC/7224/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1284/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RESTORATION / MODIFICATION / EXTENSION OF TIME IN DECIDED CRIMINAL CASE ( 1450 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAILESH KUMAR RAI @ MINTU RAI

    Adv. PRASHANT DANSENA,ADARSH PATEL,ADARSH PATEL, ,ASHOK KUMAR KOMRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Natwar Lal Agrawal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed petitioner Shailesh Kumar Rai's application to restore Criminal Revision Petition No. 1161/2022, which had been dismissed on 28.02.2026 for non-appearance. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's explanation that he was engaged in another court matter and was therefore absent when called. The restoration was granted subject to the petitioner depositing Rs. 10,000 to the High Court Legal Services Authority as costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1284/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed petitioner Shailesh Kumar Rai's application to restore Criminal Revision Petition No. 1161/2022, which had been dismissed on 28.02.2026 for non-appearance. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's explanation that he was engaged in another court matter and was therefore absent when called. The restoration was granted subject to the petitioner depositing Rs. 10,000 to the High Court Legal Services Authority as costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case