SMT. SADHBANI MAHARANA AJAY MAHAKUNDA, ,YASH BOTHRA,YASH BOTHRA vs THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE — WPCR/205/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010125432026

Filing Number

WPCR/7207/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPCR/205/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 1440 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. SADHBANI MAHARANA AJAY MAHAKUNDA, ,YASH BOTHRA,YASH BOTHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

  2. 2.The Station House Officer,

  3. 3.Smt. Radha Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Smt. Sadhbani Maharana on the ground that the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls and the petition contained 11 procedural defects as identified by the Registry. The court did not address the substantive merits of the petitioner's claims seeking to quash lower court orders and direct FIR registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCR/205/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Smt. Sadhbani Maharana on the ground that the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls and the petition contained 11 procedural defects as identified by the Registry. The court did not address the substantive merits of the petitioner's claims seeking to quash lower court orders and direct FIR registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case