MANDO BAI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1802/2022
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010125212022
Filing Number
WPC/6944/2022
Filing Date
08-Apr-2022
Registration No
WPC/1802/2022
Registration Date
11-Apr-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES: 2601 TO 2604 ( 26 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO SALE / TRANSFER OF LAND BY SC/ST ( 2601 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANDO BAI
Adv. Rajat Agrawal,HARSHWARDHAN PARGANIHA,HARSHWARDHAN PARGANIHA, ,Manharan Lal Sahu,HARSHWARDHAN PARGANIHA
-
2.Gita Bai
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Collector
-
3.The Tehsildar Raigarh
-
4.Pradeep Kumar Gupta
Adv. Sanjay Pathak,Kapil Maini
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Summary of WPC 1802/2022 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Mando Bai and Gita Bai, who sought mandamus to quash the Collector's order dated 23.12.2021 denying permission for diverted land and sought complete case records for proper decision. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition after partial arguments, and the court dismissed it as withdrawn with no objection from the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Apr-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
-
19-Apr-2022
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
-
08-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/1802/2022
Summary of WPC 1802/2022 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Mando Bai and Gita Bai, who sought mandamus to quash the Collector's order dated 23.12.2021 denying permission for diverted land and sought complete case records for proper decision. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition after partial arguments, and the court dismissed it as withdrawn with no objection from the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts