HENRI RANGARI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WA/370/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010125092026

Filing Number

WA/7192/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

WA/370/2026

Registration Date

21-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT. ( 613 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HENRI RANGARI

    Adv. SHIVANGI AGRAWAL,Rishabh Gupta,Rishabh Gupta, ,OMPRAKASH GUPTA,KABEER KALWANI,MAYANK GUPTA,SANDEEP PATEL,SANDEEP PATEL,SHASHWAT MISHRA,ADITYA DHAR DIWAN,Arpan Verma,Rishabh Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Collector,

  3. 3.Collector (Finance Department),

  4. 4.Tehsildar, Kurud,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: WA/370/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Henri Rangari's appeal challenging rejection of his compassionate appointment claim following his father's death. The court upheld the lower court's decision, holding that because Rangari's step-brother Virendra Bahadur Rangari is employed in government service, Clause 6(A) of the Compassionate Appointment Policy 2013 bars other family members from receiving compassionate appointments, regardless of whether that family member resides separately or is dependent. Key Reasoning: The court found no infirmity in the Single Judge's reasoning and affirmed that compassionate appointment is an exception to normal recruitment rules that must strictly comply with policy conditions. The policy contains no exception for family members residing separately or lacking dependence on the deceased employee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Additional Registrar(j)

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/370/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WA/370/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Henri Rangari's appeal challenging rejection of his compassionate appointment claim following his father's death. The court upheld the lower court's decision, holding that because Rangari's step-brother Virendra Bahadur Rangari is employed in government service, Clause 6(A) of the Compassionate Appointment Policy 2013 bars other family members from receiving compassionate appointments, regardless of whether that family member resides separately or is dependent. Key Reasoning: The court found no infirmity in the Single Judge's reasoning and affirmed that compassionate appointment is an exception to normal recruitment rules that must strictly comply with policy conditions. The policy contains no exception for family members residing separately or lacking dependence on the deceased employee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case