NAMDAS KOSLE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3270/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010124952026

Filing Number

MCRC/5310/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3270/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAMDAS KOSLE

    Adv. Satya Prakash Verma,RUBY VERMA,RUBY VERMA, ,AJAY KUMAR CHANDRA,AJAY KUMAR CHANDRA,AJAY KUMAR CHANDRA,RITIKA VERMA,UMAKANT SINGH CHANDEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Namdas Kosle, arrested for illegal possession of 6 liters of Mahua liquor under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act. The court considered that he had been in custody since March 4, 2026, the chargesheet was filed, and trial completion would take considerable time, outweighing the prosecution's argument about his three prior Excise Act cases (two disposed, one pending). Bail was conditional on furnishing personal bond with two sureties and compliance with stringent conditions including mandatory personal presence at key trial dates and no adjournments when witnesses are present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3270/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Namdas Kosle, arrested for illegal possession of 6 liters of Mahua liquor under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act. The court considered that he had been in custody since March 4, 2026, the chargesheet was filed, and trial completion would take considerable time, outweighing the prosecution's argument about his three prior Excise Act cases (two disposed, one pending). Bail was conditional on furnishing personal bond with two sureties and compliance with stringent conditions including mandatory personal presence at key trial dates and no adjournments when witnesses are present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case