SANTURAM KAMAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3403/2026
Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 29th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010124802026
Filing Number
MCRC/5303/2026
Filing Date
25-Mar-2026
Registration No
MCRC/3403/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANTURAM KAMAR
Adv. Anway Tiwari,SATISH SURYA..,SATISH SURYA.., ,SATISH SURYA..
-
2.Ramcharn Kamar,
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
SUMMARY: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a bail application filed by Santuram Kamar and Ramcharan Kamar as withdrawn, noting that they had already been granted bail by the same court on 24.03.2026 in a separate order. The court cautioned the applicants against filing duplicate or frivolous applications in the future and had initially issued notice to the deponent for potential contempt of court proceedings before accepting the withdrawal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
28-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
28-Apr-2026
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/3403/2026
SUMMARY: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a bail application filed by Santuram Kamar and Ramcharan Kamar as withdrawn, noting that they had already been granted bail by the same court on 24.03.2026 in a separate order. The court cautioned the applicants against filing duplicate or frivolous applications in the future and had initially issued notice to the deponent for potential contempt of court proceedings before accepting the withdrawal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts