BABULAL RAVI NITIKA SAHU, ,ANUSHKA SINGH CHOUHAN,ASTHA PATEL,MAHIMA CHANDRA,HARSH VERMA,HAMIDA SIDDIQUI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3444/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010124602026

Filing Number

MCRC/5293/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3444/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BABULAL RAVI NITIKA SAHU, ,ANUSHKA SINGH CHOUHAN,ASTHA PATEL,MAHIMA CHANDRA,HARSH VERMA,HAMIDA SIDDIQUI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/3444/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of Babulal Ravi, accused of culpable homicide and related offences under the BNS, 2023. The applicant was arrested for intentionally ramming a motorcycle with a vehicle at high speed, resulting in two deaths following a dispute over groundnut cultivation. Justice Radhakishan Agrawal held that sufficient grounds existed to implicate the accused and the grave nature of the offence did not justify bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3444/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/3444/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of Babulal Ravi, accused of culpable homicide and related offences under the BNS, 2023. The applicant was arrested for intentionally ramming a motorcycle with a vehicle at high speed, resulting in two deaths following a dispute over groundnut cultivation. Justice Radhakishan Agrawal held that sufficient grounds existed to implicate the accused and the grave nature of the offence did not justify bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case