SMT. VINITA vs RUPESH KUMAR NAMDEO Advocate - ADITYA KHARE — FA(MAT)/117/2025

Status: For Orders [On Office Notes]. Next hearing: : -.

For Orders [On Office Notes] Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010124562025

Filing Number

FA(MAT)/6934/2025

Filing Date

27-Mar-2025

Registration No

FA(MAT)/117/2025

Registration Date

01-Apr-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

FAMILY LAW MATTERS ( 15 )

Sub-Category

OTHER DIVORCE MATTERS. ( 1502 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. VINITA

    Adv. BHARAT RAJPUT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RUPESH KUMAR NAMDEO Advocate - ADITYA KHARE

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

    Summary: In FA(MAT) No. 117 of 2025 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, the case between Smt. Vinita (appellant) and Rupesh Kumar Namdeo was adjourned. The court granted four weeks' time to the appellant's counsel to remove the defaults pointed out by the Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  4. 09-May-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  5. 03-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  6. 03-Apr-2025

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

  7. 27-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA(MAT)/117/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In FA(MAT) No. 117 of 2025 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, the case between Smt. Vinita (appellant) and Rupesh Kumar Namdeo was adjourned. The court granted four weeks' time to the appellant's counsel to remove the defaults pointed out by the Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case