SMT. KEVRA BAI SAHU vs TIJESHWAR SAHU — CRR/506/2026

Status: Motion Hearing Matters. Next hearing: : -.

Motion Hearing Matters Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010124552026

Filing Number

CRR/5291/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRR/506/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO MAINTENANCE U/S 144 & 146 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1402 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. KEVRA BAI SAHU

    Adv. ANIRUDDH SINGH,SAMYAK SINGHAI JAIN,SAMYAK SINGHAI JAIN, ,SANCHIT BHATT,SANCHIT BHATT,SAMYAK SINGHAI JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TIJESHWAR SAHU

  2. 2.DEEPKUMAR SAHU

  3. 3.MISS JIGYASA SAHU

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case CRR/506/2026 Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the case on 06.05.2026 due to incomplete service of notice on respondent No.1 (the applicant's husband). The court directed the Superintendent of Police, District Rajnandgaon, to ensure proper service of notice and instructed the State Counsel to communicate the order for compliance. The matter is to be relisted after summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/506/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case CRR/506/2026 Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the case on 06.05.2026 due to incomplete service of notice on respondent No.1 (the applicant's husband). The court directed the Superintendent of Police, District Rajnandgaon, to ensure proper service of notice and instructed the State Counsel to communicate the order for compliance. The matter is to be relisted after summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case