SMT. LEELA BAI OGRE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPHC/7/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010123932026
Filing Number
WPHC/7141/2026
Filing Date
25-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPHC/7/2026
Registration Date
27-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
HABEAS CORPUS MATTERS ( 13 )
Sub-Category
WRIT PETITIONS RELATING TO HABEAS CORPUS MATTERS. ( 1301 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. LEELA BAI OGRE
Adv. KRISHNA KUMAR DEWANGAN,PRAHLAD SHRIVAS,PRAHLAD SHRIVAS, ,PRAHLAD SHRIVAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Collector Raipur
-
3.The Superintendent of Police
-
4.The Chairman
Adv. Ashutosh Singh Kachhawaha
-
5.The Superintendent
-
6.Smt. Neeta Barle
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after finding that the petitioner's major daughter, Sunita Ogre, had already been released from Nari Niketan Kendra on 30.03.2026, rendering the primary relief sought moot. However, the Court observed that authorities exercising statutory powers must act strictly within legal bounds and cannot curtail personal liberty of a major individual except through due process established by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
25-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPHC/7/2026
Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after finding that the petitioner's major daughter, Sunita Ogre, had already been released from Nari Niketan Kendra on 30.03.2026, rendering the primary relief sought moot. However, the Court observed that authorities exercising statutory powers must act strictly within legal bounds and cannot curtail personal liberty of a major individual except through due process established by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts