BASANT KUMAR TOPPO vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/2931/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010123422026

Filing Number

WPS/7108/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPS/2931/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

TRANSFER MATTERS. ( 617 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BASANT KUMAR TOPPO

    Adv. SANDEEP SINHA,RAKESH SAHU,RAKESH SAHU, ,VIJAY KUMAR SAHU,SANDEEP YADAV,RAKESH SAHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Joint Secretary

  3. 3.Director

  4. 4.Deputy Director

  5. 5.Deputy Director

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition filed by Senior Agriculture Development Officer Basant Kumar Toppo challenging his transfer order, finding that he had not exhausted the internal remedy available under the transfer policy. The court permitted the petitioner to submit a representation before the transfer policy committee, which was directed to consider and decide the matter within four weeks in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/2931/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition filed by Senior Agriculture Development Officer Basant Kumar Toppo challenging his transfer order, finding that he had not exhausted the internal remedy available under the transfer policy. The court permitted the petitioner to submit a representation before the transfer policy committee, which was directed to consider and decide the matter within four weeks in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case