SANTKUMAR GAVEL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1419/2026

Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010123182026

Filing Number

WPC/7092/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPC/1419/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND ACQUISITION & REQUISITION MATTERS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES. ( 504 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTKUMAR GAVEL

    Adv. RAMESH NAYAK

  2. 2.Veersingh Gavel

  3. 3.Amar Singh Gavel

  4. 4.Dharamlal Gavel

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Collector Sakti

  3. 3.Sub Division Officer (Revenue)

  4. 4.Executive Engineer

  5. 5.Sub Division Officer

  6. 6.Tahsildar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the petitioners' writ petition, directing the Collector of Sakti District to expeditiously process their application for compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act 2013, after conducting land demarcation. The court upheld property rights as a constitutional right under Article 300A, ruling that no person can be deprived of property without due process and adequate compensation, and set a 90-day deadline for completion of this exercise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/1419/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the petitioners' writ petition, directing the Collector of Sakti District to expeditiously process their application for compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act 2013, after conducting land demarcation. The court upheld property rights as a constitutional right under Article 300A, ruling that no person can be deprived of property without due process and adequate compensation, and set a 90-day deadline for completion of this exercise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case