GYANESHWAR MISHRA @ VICKY MISHRA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/481/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010122962026

Filing Number

MCRCA/5221/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/481/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GYANESHWAR MISHRA @ VICKY MISHRA

    Adv. Aditi Singhvi,Prasoon Agrawal,Prasoon Agrawal, ,SWEKSHA SHARMA,Prasoon Agrawal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted anticipatory bail to Gyaneshwar Mishra, who faced charges of obstructing public servants, abusing police, and assault during a traffic check on March 11, 2026. The court found that the injury caused was simple in nature, the applicant had no criminal antecedents, and the essential ingredients of the alleged offences were not conclusively made out. Bail was granted on standard conditions including personal bond, surety, appearance in court, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/481/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted anticipatory bail to Gyaneshwar Mishra, who faced charges of obstructing public servants, abusing police, and assault during a traffic check on March 11, 2026. The court found that the injury caused was simple in nature, the applicant had no criminal antecedents, and the essential ingredients of the alleged offences were not conclusively made out. Bail was granted on standard conditions including personal bond, surety, appearance in court, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case