BUDHURAM vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1433/2026
Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010122722026
Filing Number
WPC/7059/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPC/1433/2026
Registration Date
27-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND ACQUISITION & REQUISITION MATTERS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES. ( 504 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BUDHURAM
Adv. Pranjal Agrawal,RAMAKANT PATEL,RAMAKANT PATEL, ,RAMAKANT PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Secretary,
-
3.Collector,
-
4.Sub Divisional Officer (R), Cum Land Acquisition Officer,
-
5.Executive Engineer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation within 15 days regarding his agricultural land that came under the submergence area of Kalma Bairaj dam. The respondent authorities were directed to verify the petitioner's claims and initiate land acquisition proceedings within 90 days, determining appropriate compensation if the land indeed falls within the submergence zone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Additional Registrar(j)
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/1433/2026
The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation within 15 days regarding his agricultural land that came under the submergence area of Kalma Bairaj dam. The respondent authorities were directed to verify the petitioner's claims and initiate land acquisition proceedings within 90 days, determining appropriate compensation if the land indeed falls within the submergence zone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts