ANIL KUMAR PATIL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1068/2026
Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 16th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010122392026
Filing Number
CRMP/5201/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRMP/1068/2026
Registration Date
13-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANIL KUMAR PATIL
Adv. T.K.TIWARI,VEETHIKA CHOUBEY,VEETHIKA CHOUBEY, ,ANKIT SWARNKAR,VEETHIKA CHOUBEY
-
2.Smt. Kumari Bai Patil
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Supreintendent of Police
-
3.Incharge Smriti Nagar Police Chowki
-
4.Supreintendent of Police
-
5.Town Inspector
-
6.Smt. Madhuri Patil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the petition filed by Anil Kumar Patil and Smt. Kumari Bai Patil seeking to quash a chargesheet in case no. 1551/2025 for alleged offense under Section 85 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found the petition defective as it failed to challenge the cognizance order or the charge-framing order, indicating casual drafting by counsel. The court dismissed the petition with liberty to refile with proper prayers, subject to depositing Rs. 1,000 as costs to be directed to the Children Observation Home. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMP/1068/2026
The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the petition filed by Anil Kumar Patil and Smt. Kumari Bai Patil seeking to quash a chargesheet in case no. 1551/2025 for alleged offense under Section 85 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found the petition defective as it failed to challenge the cognizance order or the charge-framing order, indicating casual drafting by counsel. The court dismissed the petition with liberty to refile with proper prayers, subject to depositing Rs. 1,000 as costs to be directed to the Children Observation Home. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts