SATYENDRA CHANDRAVANSHI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/2845/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010121802026

Filing Number

WPS/7003/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPS/2845/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

TRANSFER MATTERS. ( 617 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATYENDRA CHANDRAVANSHI

    Adv. DEEPALI PANDEY,ATUL PANDEY,ATUL PANDEY, ,SUKHI RAM SAHU,ANUBHAV VATSA,UMA PATEL,ATUL PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition and directed the State respondent to consider and decide the petitioner's representation regarding amendment of his transfer order within four weeks from receipt of the court's order. The petitioner, a Principal at a Government ITI, had challenged his transfer from Kawardha to Katekalayan and sought directions to expedite decision on his pending representation dated 24.02.2026, which the State did not oppose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/2845/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition and directed the State respondent to consider and decide the petitioner's representation regarding amendment of his transfer order within four weeks from receipt of the court's order. The petitioner, a Principal at a Government ITI, had challenged his transfer from Kawardha to Katekalayan and sought directions to expedite decision on his pending representation dated 24.02.2026, which the State did not oppose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case