KALVINDER SINGH vs STATE OF C.G. Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3200/2026

Disposed: --REJECTED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010121762026

Filing Number

MCRC/5175/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3200/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--REJECTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALVINDER SINGH

    Adv. SHRI SUNIL KUMAR PANDEY,VIKAS KUMAR BAJPAI,VIKAS KUMAR BAJPAI, ,ACHALA PANDEY,UTTAM PANDEY,SMT. POOJA SINHA,VIKAS KUMAR BAJPAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF C.G. Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Kalvinder Singh's bail application in a cyber fraud case (Crime No. 593/2025). Singh was arrested for allegedly operating a "mule account" used to launder fraudulent funds, with ₹52,81,736 credited and ₹52,36,251 withdrawn from his Bank of Karnataka account between January-November 2024. Although Singh claimed he was deceived into opening the account for ₹5,000, the court found the substantial illicit financial activity concerning and held it was not a fit case for bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3200/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Kalvinder Singh's bail application in a cyber fraud case (Crime No. 593/2025). Singh was arrested for allegedly operating a "mule account" used to launder fraudulent funds, with ₹52,81,736 credited and ₹52,36,251 withdrawn from his Bank of Karnataka account between January-November 2024. Although Singh claimed he was deceived into opening the account for ₹5,000, the court found the substantial illicit financial activity concerning and held it was not a fit case for bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case