GITESHWARI YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3361/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010121752026

Filing Number

MCRC/5174/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3361/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GITESHWARI YADAV

    Adv. AVINASH CHAND SAHU,PRIYA SHARMA,PRIYA SHARMA, ,AMAN TAMRAKAR,AMIT NAYAK,PRIYA SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the regular bail application of Giteshwari Yadav, arrested for possessing 6.480 bulk liters of country-made liquor under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. The court denied bail citing the applicant's three previous criminal antecedents under the Excise Act, the substantial quantity of liquor seized, and reliance on Supreme Court precedent (Deepak Yadav v. State of UP) that prior convictions warrant denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3361/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the regular bail application of Giteshwari Yadav, arrested for possessing 6.480 bulk liters of country-made liquor under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. The court denied bail citing the applicant's three previous criminal antecedents under the Excise Act, the substantial quantity of liquor seized, and reliance on Supreme Court precedent (Deepak Yadav v. State of UP) that prior convictions warrant denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case