MANOJ KUMAR YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1035/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010121542026
Filing Number
CRMP/5168/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRMP/1035/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANOJ KUMAR YADAV
Adv. VIJAY K.DESHMUKH,MS. TEJASWI MANDAVI,MS. TEJASWI MANDAVI, ,RAJENDRA PATEL,MS. TEJASWI MANDAVI
-
2.Arti Yadav
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary: CRMP /1035/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition filed by Manoj Kumar Yadav and Arti Yadav seeking to quash an FIR dated 19/06/2019 (Crime No. 193/2019) for offense under Section 498(A) IPC and the related charge sheet and magistrate's order dated 09/10/2025. The court found the petition defective because the petitioners failed to challenge the date of the order taking cognizance. The petition was dismissed with liberty for petitioners to file a fresh petition with appropriate prayers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMP/1035/2026
Case Summary: CRMP /1035/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition filed by Manoj Kumar Yadav and Arti Yadav seeking to quash an FIR dated 19/06/2019 (Crime No. 193/2019) for offense under Section 498(A) IPC and the related charge sheet and magistrate's order dated 09/10/2025. The court found the petition defective because the petitioners failed to challenge the date of the order taking cognizance. The petition was dismissed with liberty for petitioners to file a fresh petition with appropriate prayers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts