IRSHAD AHMAD vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1037/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010121222026

Filing Number

CRMP/5163/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1037/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.IRSHAD AHMAD

    Adv. SHYAM KUMAR,CHANDRASHEKHAR BAJPAI,CHANDRASHEKHAR BAJPAI, ,SAURABH KUMAR SHUKLA,Achyut tiwari,CHANDRASHEKHAR BAJPAI

  2. 2.Hadish Ahmad

  3. 3.Anjum Aara

  4. 4.Asfaq Ahmad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Smt. Sofiya Fatima

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed the petition to quash the FIR and conviction under Sections 498A and 34 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, finding that the matrimonial dispute between petitioner Irshad Ahmad and his wife was purely private in nature and had been voluntarily settled through mediation with a monetary settlement of Rs.25,00,000. The court invoked its inherent jurisdiction, following Supreme Court precedent, to quash even non-compoundable offences post-conviction where parties have amicably resolved the matter and continuation would constitute abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1037/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed the petition to quash the FIR and conviction under Sections 498A and 34 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, finding that the matrimonial dispute between petitioner Irshad Ahmad and his wife was purely private in nature and had been voluntarily settled through mediation with a monetary settlement of Rs.25,00,000. The court invoked its inherent jurisdiction, following Supreme Court precedent, to quash even non-compoundable offences post-conviction where parties have amicably resolved the matter and continuation would constitute abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case