SHANTI PRAKASH TIRKEY vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1412/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 10th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010121052026
Filing Number
WPC/6944/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPC/1412/2026
Registration Date
25-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 17-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHANTI PRAKASH TIRKEY
Adv. RAHUL MISHRA,SHARDA PRASAD,SHARDA PRASAD, ,VIVEK SAHU,SHARDA PRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Collector Balrampur
-
3.The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue)
-
4.The Naib Tahasildar Balrampur
-
5.The Divisional Forest Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court partially granted relief to a Scheduled Tribe farmer whose crops and house were destroyed by authorities on government forest land without notice or hearing. While acknowledging the state's authority to remove encroachment from forest land, the court ruled that authorities must follow due process of law and natural justice principles. The court directed that the petitioner's standing crops not be destroyed and that any dispossession proceedings must be conducted with proper notice and opportunity for hearing, to be decided expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF
-
30-Mar-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/1412/2026
Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court partially granted relief to a Scheduled Tribe farmer whose crops and house were destroyed by authorities on government forest land without notice or hearing. While acknowledging the state's authority to remove encroachment from forest land, the court ruled that authorities must follow due process of law and natural justice principles. The court directed that the petitioner's standing crops not be destroyed and that any dispossession proceedings must be conducted with proper notice and opportunity for hearing, to be decided expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts