NANDAN KUMAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRR/489/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010120672026
Filing Number
CRR/5144/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRR/489/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO SUPURDNAMA ( 1449 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NANDAN KUMAR
Adv. SIDDHARTH RATHOD,LEKHIKA RATHOD,LEKHIKA RATHOD, ,MANISH KUMAR SAHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh set aside the trial court's order and directed release of the seized Nissan Sunny Car to applicant Nandan Kumar, the registered owner, on supurdnama (undertaking). The court held that since the owner filed a valid claim within the six-month period stipulated in the acquittal judgment, the conditions for vehicle confiscation were not satisfied, and the trial court erred in failing to adjudicate the claim application before directing confiscation proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF
-
04-May-2026
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal
-
27-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF
-
27-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
-
13-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRR/489/2026
The High Court of Chhattisgarh set aside the trial court's order and directed release of the seized Nissan Sunny Car to applicant Nandan Kumar, the registered owner, on supurdnama (undertaking). The court held that since the owner filed a valid claim within the six-month period stipulated in the acquittal judgment, the conditions for vehicle confiscation were not satisfied, and the trial court erred in failing to adjudicate the claim application before directing confiscation proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts