MUKESH SARTHI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRA/974/2026

Status: For Orders [On Office Notes]. Next hearing: : -.

For Orders [On Office Notes] Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010120502026

Filing Number

CRA/5127/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRA/974/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO POCSO ACT ( 1441 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUKESH SARTHI

    Adv. MANOJ KUMAR JAISWAL,RAVI KUMAR BANJARE,RAVI KUMAR BANJARE, ,BHAGAT RAM IJARDAR,SURBHI YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted Criminal Appeal No. 974 of 2026 (Mukesh Sarthi vs. State of Chhattisgarh) and directed the State to file its reply and objection to the interim application for suspension of sentence and bail grant within two weeks, while also directing it to inform the victim's brother about the pending appeal. The court summoned the trial court record within six weeks and adjourned the matter for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA/974/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted Criminal Appeal No. 974 of 2026 (Mukesh Sarthi vs. State of Chhattisgarh) and directed the State to file its reply and objection to the interim application for suspension of sentence and bail grant within two weeks, while also directing it to inform the victim's brother about the pending appeal. The court summoned the trial court record within six weeks and adjourned the matter for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case