GULAB BAI PANDEY vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/473/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010119142026

Filing Number

MCRCA/5052/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/473/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GULAB BAI PANDEY

    Adv. SHIKHAR AGNIHOTRI,AWADH TRIPATHI,AWADH TRIPATHI, ,MANISH KUMAR SAHU,MANISH KUMAR SAHU,MANISH KUMAR SAHU,Shubham Tripathi,Shubham Tripathi,Shubham Tripathi,Vivek kumar tripathi,INDIRA TRIPATHI,AWADH TRIPATHI

  2. 2.Sangeeta Devi Pandey,

  3. 3.Adarsh Pandey,

  4. 4.Aparga Pandey

  5. 5.Archana Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to five applicants accused of fraud, forgery, and cheating in connection with the alleged sale of minor children's property using forged documents declaring the father dead. The Court allowed the application primarily because a similarly-situated co-accused had already been granted bail, and without commenting on case merits, directed their release on personal bond with conditions including court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/473/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to five applicants accused of fraud, forgery, and cheating in connection with the alleged sale of minor children's property using forged documents declaring the father dead. The Court allowed the application primarily because a similarly-situated co-accused had already been granted bail, and without commenting on case merits, directed their release on personal bond with conditions including court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case