LANDMARK ENGINEER vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1345/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010118522026

Filing Number

WPC/6819/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPC/1345/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 21 )

Sub-Category

CONTRACT ACT. ( 2103 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LANDMARK ENGINEER

    Adv. Amit Soni,KABEER KALWANI,KABEER KALWANI, ,Rishabh Gupta,Arpan Verma,SHIVANGI AGRAWAL,ADITYA DHAR DIWAN,SHASHWAT MISHRA,SANDEEP PATEL,MAYANK GUPTA,MAYANK GUPTA,KABEER KALWANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Engineer-In-Chief

  3. 3.Chief Engineer

  4. 4.Superintending Engineer

  5. 5.Executive Engineer

  6. 6.Chief Engineer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed two writ petitions filed by Landmark Engineer challenging the cancellation of tender notices and seeking contract award. The petitioner failed to furnish additional performance security within the stipulated timeframe, and the court found no grounds to interfere at that stage, though it left open the option for future legal recourse if new causes of action arise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/1345/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed two writ petitions filed by Landmark Engineer challenging the cancellation of tender notices and seeking contract award. The petitioner failed to furnish additional performance security within the stipulated timeframe, and the court found no grounds to interfere at that stage, though it left open the option for future legal recourse if new causes of action arise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case