HARISHCHAND TARAK vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/874/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010118442026
Filing Number
CRMP/5027/2026
Filing Date
20-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRMP/874/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARISHCHAND TARAK
Adv. Ravipal Maheshwari,Bharat Lal Sahu,Bharat Lal Sahu, ,Neha Khandekar,REKHRAJ BAGHEL,Bharat Lal Sahu
-
2.Kumar Sahu
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Chief Executive Officer,
Adv. GHANSHYAM PATEL,D.L.DEWANGAN AMISHA SINHA JASLEEN KAUR GULATI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court quashed FIR No. 388/2019 and all related criminal proceedings against two petitioners accused of forging MNREGA muster rolls. The court found that even accepting the prosecution's allegations as true, the essential ingredients of forgery and criminal conspiracy were absent—the petitioners' role was limited to marking attendance as "mates" with no involvement in fund disbursement, wrongful gain, or mens rea, rendering the proceedings an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMP/874/2026
Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court quashed FIR No. 388/2019 and all related criminal proceedings against two petitioners accused of forging MNREGA muster rolls. The court found that even accepting the prosecution's allegations as true, the essential ingredients of forgery and criminal conspiracy were absent—the petitioners' role was limited to marking attendance as "mates" with no involvement in fund disbursement, wrongful gain, or mens rea, rendering the proceedings an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts