SANTOSH PADE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2871/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010118242026

Filing Number

MCRC/5018/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2871/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH PADE

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR GULATI,ANIL KUMAR BHOI,ANIL KUMAR BHOI, ,GUNJA TARAM,I.BHAWANI,I.BHAWANI,MAYA CHATURVIJANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Santosh Pade in an illicit liquor smuggling case, applying the principle of parity since identical co-accused persons had already been released on bail by the same court and Supreme Court. The court found that while the applicant was implicated solely on co-accused statements with only empty bottles recovered from him (no actual liquor seized), the charges had been framed and trial would take considerable time, justifying his release on personal bond with two sureties and strict conditions regarding court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2871/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Santosh Pade in an illicit liquor smuggling case, applying the principle of parity since identical co-accused persons had already been released on bail by the same court and Supreme Court. The court found that while the applicant was implicated solely on co-accused statements with only empty bottles recovered from him (no actual liquor seized), the charges had been framed and trial would take considerable time, justifying his release on personal bond with two sureties and strict conditions regarding court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case