ARMAN AHMAD vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2996/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010117952026
Filing Number
MCRC/5011/2026
Filing Date
20-Mar-2026
Registration No
MCRC/2996/2026
Registration Date
30-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
NDPS Act ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARMAN AHMAD
Adv. HEMANT GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Arman Ahmad and Ashish Nirmalkar, who were arrested for alleged NDPS Act violations after 90.1 grams of Nitrazepam tablets were seized. The court found the quantity was below commercial threshold, the chargesheet was filed, and the applicants had been in custody since January 8, 2026 with trial likely to take considerable time. Bail was granted on personal bond with sureties and strict conditions including mandatory court attendance and undertakings against adjournment delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
20-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/2996/2026
The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Arman Ahmad and Ashish Nirmalkar, who were arrested for alleged NDPS Act violations after 90.1 grams of Nitrazepam tablets were seized. The court found the quantity was below commercial threshold, the chargesheet was filed, and the applicants had been in custody since January 8, 2026 with trial likely to take considerable time. Bail was granted on personal bond with sureties and strict conditions including mandatory court attendance and undertakings against adjournment delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts