DEEPAK KUMAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPCR/174/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010117552026

Filing Number

WPCR/6764/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPCR/174/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 1440 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPAK KUMAR

    Adv. Bharat Lal Sahu,Chandra Prakash Lahrey,Chandra Prakash Lahrey, ,Chandra Prakash Lahrey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Director General of Police

  3. 3.Superintendent of Police

  4. 4.Station House Officer

  5. 5.Rishi Patel

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking mandamus to register an FIR against Respondent No. 5 for criminal intimidation and property damage, finding that the petitioner had adequate alternative remedies under Sections 175(3) and 223 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court relied on precedent from similar cases (Akhilesh Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh) and directed the petitioner to pursue relief through appropriate forums before the lower court rather than through writ jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCR/174/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking mandamus to register an FIR against Respondent No. 5 for criminal intimidation and property damage, finding that the petitioner had adequate alternative remedies under Sections 175(3) and 223 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court relied on precedent from similar cases (Akhilesh Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh) and directed the petitioner to pursue relief through appropriate forums before the lower court rather than through writ jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case