NARSINGH RATHIYA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2772/2026

Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010116982026

Filing Number

MCRC/4959/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2772/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

POCSO Act ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARSINGH RATHIYA

    Adv. RAJENDRA PATEL,ANIRUDDHA SHRIVASTAVA,ANIRUDDHA SHRIVASTAVA, ,KHILENDRA SAHU,SANGEETA KAUSHIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a bail application filed by 19-year-old Narsingh Rathiya, accused of offences under BNS Section 64(2)(m) and POCSO Act Sections 4 & 6, as withdrawn at the applicant's counsel's request with liberty to file fresh. Although the victim and her parents expressed no-objection to bail through video conference, the court allowed withdrawal, permitting reapplication at a later time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2772/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a bail application filed by 19-year-old Narsingh Rathiya, accused of offences under BNS Section 64(2)(m) and POCSO Act Sections 4 & 6, as withdrawn at the applicant's counsel's request with liberty to file fresh. Although the victim and her parents expressed no-objection to bail through video conference, the court allowed withdrawal, permitting reapplication at a later time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case