MISS P RANJANA JAISWAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/2942/2021

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010116952021

Filing Number

WPS/6693/2021

Filing Date

13-Apr-2021

Registration No

WPS/2942/2021

Registration Date

16-Jun-2021

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MISS P RANJANA JAISWAL

    Adv. AJAY SHRIVASTAVA,SATYA KUMAR MANDLOI,SATYA KUMAR MANDLOI, ,SATYA KUMAR MANDLOI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Director

  3. 3.District Education Officer

  4. 4.Principal

    Adv. Ghanshyam Kashyap,ishan verma NELSON PANNA NOEL PANNA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition of Miss P Ranjana Jaiswal, a teacher at a grant-in-aid school, seeking pension benefits at par with government teachers. The court held that under the CG Ashaskiya Shikshan Sanstha Act, 1978, and the Grant-in-Aid Rules, 1979, teachers at aided schools are not entitled to pension benefits, and without specific rules framed under Article 309 of the Constitution, the court cannot direct the state to provide such benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Aug-2021

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy

  4. 25-Jun-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF

  5. 25-Jun-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Apr-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/2942/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition of Miss P Ranjana Jaiswal, a teacher at a grant-in-aid school, seeking pension benefits at par with government teachers. The court held that under the CG Ashaskiya Shikshan Sanstha Act, 1978, and the Grant-in-Aid Rules, 1979, teachers at aided schools are not entitled to pension benefits, and without specific rules framed under Article 309 of the Constitution, the court cannot direct the state to provide such benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case