AAKASH SINGHAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/857/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010116872026
Filing Number
CRMP/4953/2026
Filing Date
19-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRMP/857/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO RESTORATION / MODIFICATION / EXTENSION OF TIME IN DECIDED CRIMINAL CASE ( 1450 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AAKASH SINGHAL
Adv. RUPESH SHRIVASTAVA,Chandradeep Prasad,Chandradeep Prasad, ,YASH YADAV,Chandradeep Prasad,Chandradeep Prasad
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Mohd. Sabbir
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted the petitioner Aakash Singhal a two-day extension to deposit Rs. 2,000 as court cost, finding his request reasonable given the bona fide circumstances—his counsel's father's death during Holi and the petitioner being out of station. The court disposed of the petition with the condition that no further extension would be granted beyond the two days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
19-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMP/857/2026
Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted the petitioner Aakash Singhal a two-day extension to deposit Rs. 2,000 as court cost, finding his request reasonable given the bona fide circumstances—his counsel's father's death during Holi and the petitioner being out of station. The court disposed of the petition with the condition that no further extension would be granted beyond the two days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts