MAQSOOD @ MAKKU vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2938/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010116252026

Filing Number

MCRC/4931/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2938/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAQSOOD @ MAKKU

    Adv. GHANSHYAM SHARMA,Manisha Yadav,Manisha Yadav, ,SUMIT SINGH RATHORE,Durga Mehar,Manisha Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the bail application of Maqsood, arrested for alleged involvement in a sextortion-blackmail scheme involving obscene photographs and threats that extorted ₹3,50,040 from the complainant. The court rejected bail considering the serious nature of charges (cheating, extortion, forgery, IT Act violations), the applicant's role in planning the scheme as named by co-accused in their statements, his absconding status until December 2025 for a 2023 crime, and the conviction of two co-accused after trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2938/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the bail application of Maqsood, arrested for alleged involvement in a sextortion-blackmail scheme involving obscene photographs and threats that extorted ₹3,50,040 from the complainant. The court rejected bail considering the serious nature of charges (cheating, extortion, forgery, IT Act violations), the applicant's role in planning the scheme as named by co-accused in their statements, his absconding status until December 2025 for a 2023 crime, and the conviction of two co-accused after trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case