TUFAN SINGH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1302/2026

Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010116132026

Filing Number

WPC/6688/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPC/1302/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO ENCROACHMENTS ON GOVERNMENT LAND AND DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS. ( 1708 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TUFAN SINGH

    Adv. Bharat Lal Dembra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.COLLECTOR

  3. 3.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER(R)

  4. 4.THE TAHSILDAR

  5. 5.SARIFUNNISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition challenging inaction on an alleged government land encroachment, directing the Tahsildar to complete proceedings and decide the petitioner's application within 45 days. The court criticized the Revenue Authority for failing to formally register a revenue case despite initiating proceedings, and directed the District Collector to ensure proper case registration in future encroachment matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/1302/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition challenging inaction on an alleged government land encroachment, directing the Tahsildar to complete proceedings and decide the petitioner's application within 45 days. The court criticized the Revenue Authority for failing to formally register a revenue case despite initiating proceedings, and directed the District Collector to ensure proper case registration in future encroachment matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case