NEERAJ SINGH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WA/300/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010115632026
Filing Number
WA/6653/2026
Filing Date
19-Mar-2026
Registration No
WA/300/2026
Registration Date
25-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES: 2601 TO 2604 ( 26 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS. ( 2604 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NEERAJ SINGH
Adv. Vivek Kumar Shrivastava,VINAY KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA,VINAY KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA, ,M.L.SAKAT,M.L.SAKAT,KHILENDRA SAHU,B.P.SHARMA,B.P.SHARMA,VINAY KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Collector
-
3.Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue)
-
4.Prabhakar Tiwari
Adv. Harpreet Singh Ahluwalia
-
5.Umesh Kumar Rathore
-
6.Dhansai
-
7.Chitrabhan Singh Rathore
-
8.Vinod Kumar Goyal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the appellant Neeraj Singh's writ appeal challenging a Single Judge's order, finding the matter already executed by the Collector's final order dated 25.03.2026. The court held it improper to entertain the appeal after execution, though noting the appellant's complaint about not being heard in the earlier proceedings, and left open the appellant's right to pursue further legal remedies against the Collector's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
19-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WA/300/2026
The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the appellant Neeraj Singh's writ appeal challenging a Single Judge's order, finding the matter already executed by the Collector's final order dated 25.03.2026. The court held it improper to entertain the appeal after execution, though noting the appellant's complaint about not being heard in the earlier proceedings, and left open the appellant's right to pursue further legal remedies against the Collector's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts