ATIK AHMED @ JUMMAN SHEIKH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/478/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010115622026

Filing Number

MCRCA/4910/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/478/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ATIK AHMED @ JUMMAN SHEIKH

    Adv. SANJAY AGRAWAL,KRISHNA TANDON,KRISHNA TANDON, ,VIDHI MATLANI,VIDHI MATLANI,VIDHI MATLANI,SHRUTI SHRIVASTAVA,SHRUTI SHRIVASTAVA,KRISHNA TANDON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Atik Ahmed (shop proprietor) in a counterfeit diesel/urea case involving Copyright Act and BNS violations. The court found that the applicant, engaged purely in trading activities, lacked direct involvement in manufacturing or affixing counterfeit labels/holograms, and the essential ingredients of the alleged offences were not prima facie attracted. The bail was granted with standard conditions including personal bond, court appearances, and restrictions on witness interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/478/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Atik Ahmed (shop proprietor) in a counterfeit diesel/urea case involving Copyright Act and BNS violations. The court found that the applicant, engaged purely in trading activities, lacked direct involvement in manufacturing or affixing counterfeit labels/holograms, and the essential ingredients of the alleged offences were not prima facie attracted. The bail was granted with standard conditions including personal bond, court appearances, and restrictions on witness interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case