INDRAWATI YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1421/2026
Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010115122026
Filing Number
WPC/6616/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPC/1421/2026
Registration Date
27-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND ACQUISITION & REQUISITION MATTERS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES. ( 504 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.INDRAWATI YADAV
Adv. Anurag Singh,JIGYASA SINGH,JIGYASA SINGH, ,RAKESH KUMAR KASHYAP,MANOJ KUMAR JAISWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Collector Ambikapur
-
3.Tahsildar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition by granting the petitioner liberty to file an application before the Collector, Ambikapur seeking either alternative land allotment or compensation for 0.202 hectares of her private land that was encroached upon during construction of a Police Training School. The Collector was directed to decide the matter expeditiously within 60 days, with the court acknowledging the Tahsildar's report confirming the encroachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/1421/2026
The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition by granting the petitioner liberty to file an application before the Collector, Ambikapur seeking either alternative land allotment or compensation for 0.202 hectares of her private land that was encroached upon during construction of a Police Training School. The Collector was directed to decide the matter expeditiously within 60 days, with the court acknowledging the Tahsildar's report confirming the encroachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts