SHANTABAI SANDE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2858/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010114412026

Filing Number

MCRC/4864/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2858/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANTABAI SANDE

    Adv. SHIKHAR SHARMA,RAGHVENDRA PRADHAN,RAGHVENDRA PRADHAN, ,VIKRAM PRATAP,PRACHI SINGH,RAGHVENDRA PRADHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Shantabai Sande, arrested under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act for alleged possession of 35 liters of country-made liquor. The court found that while the applicant had been in judicial custody since February 8, 2026, and the charge sheet was filed, the trial was likely to take considerable time; additionally, the applicant had no previous antecedents, warranting bail. The release was subject to strict conditions including personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court appearances, and undertakings not to seek adjournments or misuse bail liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2858/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Shantabai Sande, arrested under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act for alleged possession of 35 liters of country-made liquor. The court found that while the applicant had been in judicial custody since February 8, 2026, and the charge sheet was filed, the trial was likely to take considerable time; additionally, the applicant had no previous antecedents, warranting bail. The release was subject to strict conditions including personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court appearances, and undertakings not to seek adjournments or misuse bail liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case