BHUVNESHWAR KASHYAP vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2787/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010114322026

Filing Number

MCRC/4859/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2787/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

POCSO Act ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHUVNESHWAR KASHYAP

    Adv. SONI MISHRA,RAKESH PANDEY,RAKESH PANDEY, ,RAKESH PANDEY,RAKESH PANDEY,RAKESH PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the bail application of Bhuvneshwar Kashyap, accused of sexually assaulting a minor victim and committing repeated sexual intercourse with her under pretext of marriage, resulting in her pregnancy. The court considered the gravity of offences under BNS and POCSO Act, the victim's minority status, the applicant's prior criminal record, and material evidence against him as sufficient grounds to deny bail, while directing the trial court to expedite proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2787/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the bail application of Bhuvneshwar Kashyap, accused of sexually assaulting a minor victim and committing repeated sexual intercourse with her under pretext of marriage, resulting in her pregnancy. The court considered the gravity of offences under BNS and POCSO Act, the victim's minority status, the applicant's prior criminal record, and material evidence against him as sufficient grounds to deny bail, while directing the trial court to expedite proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case