GAYATRI SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/906/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010114292026
Filing Number
CRMP/4857/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRMP/906/2026
Registration Date
27-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GAYATRI SAHU
Adv. Gunjan Tiwari,SANDEEP JHA,SANDEEP JHA, ,SANDEEP JHA
-
2.Raghubar Sahu
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Mamta Sahu
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the petition and quashed FIR No. 21/2023 registered under IPC Sections 498A/34 against petitioners Gayatri Sahu and Raghubar Sahu, along with all related criminal proceedings (Case No. 3100/2023). The court found that since the husband (Kishan Sahu) and the complainant (Mamta Sahu) had amicably settled their disputes, and the court had already quashed proceedings against the husband subject to fulfillment of compromise terms dated 26.07.2025, it was in the interest of justice to also quash proceedings against the present petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMP/906/2026
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the petition and quashed FIR No. 21/2023 registered under IPC Sections 498A/34 against petitioners Gayatri Sahu and Raghubar Sahu, along with all related criminal proceedings (Case No. 3100/2023). The court found that since the husband (Kishan Sahu) and the complainant (Mamta Sahu) had amicably settled their disputes, and the court had already quashed proceedings against the husband subject to fulfillment of compromise terms dated 26.07.2025, it was in the interest of justice to also quash proceedings against the present petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts