RAJEEV VERMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — REVP/118/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010114282026

Filing Number

REVP/6572/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

REVP/118/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

REVIEW PETITON ( 1736 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJEEV VERMA

    Adv. AJAY THAKRE,MANISH UPADHYAY,MANISH UPADHYAY, ,ABHINAV TIWARI,MANISH UPADHYAY

  2. 2.Puran Chand Dewangan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Engineer in Chief

  3. 3.Sub Divisional Officer

  4. 4.Executive Engineer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the review petition, recalling writ petition WPS No. 535/2026 due to incorrect description of petitioners in the cause title, which prevented them from benefiting from the court's earlier order directing respondents to consider their representation. The court re-registered the petition in its original number to ensure petitioners obtain the fruitful outcomes of the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. REVP/118/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the review petition, recalling writ petition WPS No. 535/2026 due to incorrect description of petitioners in the cause title, which prevented them from benefiting from the court's earlier order directing respondents to consider their representation. The court re-registered the petition in its original number to ensure petitioners obtain the fruitful outcomes of the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case