PAWAN SINGH vs SMT. DURGA — CRR/436/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010114112026

Filing Number

CRR/4851/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRR/436/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO MAINTENANCE U/S 144 & 146 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1402 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAWAN SINGH

    Adv. RAJEEV KUMAR DUBEY,MAYA CHATURVIJANI,MAYA CHATURVIJANI, ,MAYA CHATURVIJANI,MAYA CHATURVIJANI,MAYA CHATURVIJANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. DURGA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the husband's criminal revision challenging the Family Court's maintenance order of Rs. 3,000/month. The court upheld the Family Court's findings that the wife's allegations of cruelty, assault, and neglect were substantiated by her separate residence since 2023, and that the awarded amount was reasonable and not excessive given the husband's financial capacity. The High Court found no illegality or jurisdictional error in the lower court's well-reasoned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/436/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the husband's criminal revision challenging the Family Court's maintenance order of Rs. 3,000/month. The court upheld the Family Court's findings that the wife's allegations of cruelty, assault, and neglect were substantiated by her separate residence since 2023, and that the awarded amount was reasonable and not excessive given the husband's financial capacity. The High Court found no illegality or jurisdictional error in the lower court's well-reasoned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case