RAKESH VERMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2872/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010113502026

Filing Number

MCRC/4826/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2872/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAKESH VERMA

    Adv. VAIBHAV A.GOVERDHAN

  2. 2.Narottam Verma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of Rakesh Verma and Narottam Verma, who were arrested for allegedly assaulting Omkar Verma with a screwdriver on January 18, 2026. The court found the allegations serious based on the medical evidence showing the victim sustained four stab wounds on vital body parts (chest, abdomen, ribs) and severe internal injuries including renal laceration, pneumothorax, hemothorax, and spinal injury, coupled with recovery of the weapon used in the assault, establishing active involvement of the applicants in the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2872/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of Rakesh Verma and Narottam Verma, who were arrested for allegedly assaulting Omkar Verma with a screwdriver on January 18, 2026. The court found the allegations serious based on the medical evidence showing the victim sustained four stab wounds on vital body parts (chest, abdomen, ribs) and severe internal injuries including renal laceration, pneumothorax, hemothorax, and spinal injury, coupled with recovery of the weapon used in the assault, establishing active involvement of the applicants in the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case