SANA MEMAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPPIL/59/2022

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010113272022

Filing Number

WPPIL/6269/2022

Filing Date

30-Mar-2022

Registration No

WPPIL/59/2022

Registration Date

04-Apr-2022

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

LETTER PETITION & PIL MATTERS ( 8 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES. ( 812 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANA MEMAN

    Adv. PRAVEEN DAS,AMIYA BHUSHAN,AMIYA BHUSHAN, ,GARY MUKHOPADHAYAY,VIVEK SHARMA,AYUSHI AGRAWAL,ABHISHEK CHANDRA GUPTA,BENNOON,ADARSH RAJPUT,ADARSH RAJPUT

  2. 2.Siddhant Das

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.State Bar Council of Chhattisgarh

    Adv. Palash Tiwari,SHAYON KAR Akshat Rajesh Mishra

  3. 3.Bar Council of India

    Adv. SHIVANG DUBEY,Shubham Dev Mallick

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh (WPPIL 59/2022) adjourned the matter to July 2026 pending Finance Department approval. The court directed the Principal Secretary of Law & Legislative Affairs to file a fresh affidavit confirming whether the Trustee Committee's resolution for a one-time grant to newly enrolled advocates has received Finance Department concurrence. The court expressed hope that effective steps would be taken for approval. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  7. 24-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  8. 13-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  9. 12-Aug-2024

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

  10. 23-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani DubeyView PDF

  11. 20-Feb-2024

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF

  12. 10-Jan-2024

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  13. 25-Dec-2023

    Motion Hearing Matters ( Dormant Case )

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  14. 26-Sep-2023

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  15. 23-Aug-2023

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  16. 14-Jul-2023

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani DubeyView PDF

  17. 02-Aug-2022

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  18. 13-Apr-2022

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam ChourdiyaView PDF

  19. 13-Apr-2022

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya

  20. 08-Apr-2022

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam ChourdiyaView PDF

  21. 08-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 30-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPPIL/59/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh (WPPIL 59/2022) adjourned the matter to July 2026 pending Finance Department approval. The court directed the Principal Secretary of Law & Legislative Affairs to file a fresh affidavit confirming whether the Trustee Committee's resolution for a one-time grant to newly enrolled advocates has received Finance Department concurrence. The court expressed hope that effective steps would be taken for approval. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case