SMT. KRISHNA NAMDEV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1366/2026

Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010113202026

Filing Number

WPC/6504/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPC/1366/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. KRISHNA NAMDEV

    Adv. SHANTANU KUMAR,Chandra Prakash Lahrey,Chandra Prakash Lahrey, ,RAVI KUMAR BHAGAT,Chandra Prakash Lahrey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Collector,

  3. 3.Sub Divisional Officer

  4. 4.Tahsildar.

  5. 5.Gram Panchayat Banahil,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

    Case Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a writ petition by a landowner challenging the Tahsildar's rejection of her claim to recover possession of her 2.90-acre land that was encroached upon by villagers who constructed a graveyard, road, and water pump. The court ruled that without entering into case merits, it directed the District Collector to decide the petitioner's pending application (dated 29.04.2025) for alternative land or compensation within 60 days, finding the revenue authority had jurisdiction to consider such relief even though the Tahsildar correctly noted the dispute involved private parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Additional Registrar(j)

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/1366/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a writ petition by a landowner challenging the Tahsildar's rejection of her claim to recover possession of her 2.90-acre land that was encroached upon by villagers who constructed a graveyard, road, and water pump. The court ruled that without entering into case merits, it directed the District Collector to decide the petitioner's pending application (dated 29.04.2025) for alternative land or compensation within 60 days, finding the revenue authority had jurisdiction to consider such relief even though the Tahsildar correctly noted the dispute involved private parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case