HITESH PATRA vs CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY LIMITED (C.S.P.T.C.L.) Advocate - MAYANK CHANDRAKAR — WPS/2773/2026
Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 13th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010113162026
Filing Number
WPS/6500/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPS/2773/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
SELECTION, APPOINTMENT & RECRUITMENT INCLUDING EXAMINATION, INTERVIEW. ( 614 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HITESH PATRA
Adv. PUSHPENDRA KUMAR PATEL,DHANESHWARI PATEL,DHANESHWARI PATEL, ,SWAPNIL KESHARI,SWAPNIL KESHARI,SWAPNIL KESHARI,SWAPNIL KESHARI,SWAPNIL KESHARI,SWAPNIL KESHARI,DHANESHWARI PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY LIMITED (C.S.P.T.C.L.) Advocate - MAYANK CHANDRAKAR
-
2.Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd.
-
3.The Chief Engineer (M.S.)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Hitesh Patra's writ petition regarding alleged non-supply of OBC category recruitment documents by the power transmission company, finding that he had alternative legal remedies available. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate petition in accordance with law instead of pursuing the second writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/2773/2026
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Hitesh Patra's writ petition regarding alleged non-supply of OBC category recruitment documents by the power transmission company, finding that he had alternative legal remedies available. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate petition in accordance with law instead of pursuing the second writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts