RAM KHILAWAN KANWAR Govind Prasad Dewangan, ,Rupendra Kumar Dewangan vs VISHNU MANJHWAR Advocate - ANIL KUMAR GULATI — MAC/818/2024

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010112992024

Filing Number

MAC/6859/2024

Filing Date

02-Apr-2024

Registration No

MAC/818/2024

Registration Date

22-Apr-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS. ( 1210 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM KHILAWAN KANWAR Govind Prasad Dewangan, ,Rupendra Kumar Dewangan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VISHNU MANJHWAR Advocate - ANIL KUMAR GULATI

  2. 2.Ramsay Ram

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    Case Summary: In MAC 818/2024 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, the case was adjourned for further proceedings. The court ordered fresh notice to be issued to respondent no.2 (owner) via ordinary and speed post at a corrected address, as the previous notice was returned unserved. The court also directed payment of court fees within 7 working days and listed the matter for hearing after 8 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  4. 01-May-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  5. 24-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  6. 24-Apr-2024

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  7. 02-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAC/818/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In MAC 818/2024 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, the case was adjourned for further proceedings. The court ordered fresh notice to be issued to respondent no.2 (owner) via ordinary and speed post at a corrected address, as the previous notice was returned unserved. The court also directed payment of court fees within 7 working days and listed the matter for hearing after 8 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case