SHABAN ALI TRANSPORT SERVICE vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI — WPCR/162/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010112562026

Filing Number

WPCR/6468/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPCR/162/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 1440 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHABAN ALI TRANSPORT SERVICE

    Adv. SYED MOHAMMAD SOHAIL AFZAL,SYED MOHAMMAD SARTAJ AFZAL,SYED MOHAMMAD SARTAJ AFZAL, ,SYED MOHAMMAD SARTAJ AFZAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI

  2. 2.State of Chhattisgarh

    Adv. A.G.

  3. 3.Superintendent of Police/ In-Charge

  4. 4.S H O

  5. 5.State Bank of India

    Adv. Pranjal Agrawal,VIDHI AGRAWAL

  6. 6.Bank of Baroda

    Adv. VINOD DESHMUKH

  7. 7.Shri Anshul Ghodheswar

    Adv. VIKAS UPADHYAY,SATISH CHANDRA HIMANSHU YADU Pritam Singh SHALVIN SHARMA AJAY CHAWLA Sachin Nidhi Hariom Rai ANJAY MISHRA SAMEER RIGRI AISHWARY DIWAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: WPCR/162/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Shaban Ali Transport Service, finding that the cyber crime complaints and consequential bank account freezing cannot be interfered with at this premature stage of investigation. The court held that while the dispute originated from a commercial coal transaction, the serious allegations of fraud, document fabrication, and manipulation of invoices prima facie transcend a purely civil matter and warrant police inquiry. The court refused to quash the cyber complaints or direct unfreezing of accounts, emphasizing that detailed factual examination and forensic scrutiny must be conducted by competent investigating authorities before conclusive determination of the dispute's nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  7. 02-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  8. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  9. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCR/162/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPCR/162/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Shaban Ali Transport Service, finding that the cyber crime complaints and consequential bank account freezing cannot be interfered with at this premature stage of investigation. The court held that while the dispute originated from a commercial coal transaction, the serious allegations of fraud, document fabrication, and manipulation of invoices prima facie transcend a purely civil matter and warrant police inquiry. The court refused to quash the cyber complaints or direct unfreezing of accounts, emphasizing that detailed factual examination and forensic scrutiny must be conducted by competent investigating authorities before conclusive determination of the dispute's nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case